[rfc-i] The errata issue [Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher]
sm at resistor.net
Sat Aug 17 23:13:46 PDT 2013
At 20:00 17-08-2013, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>For the IETF stream, certainly. But there are three other streams, and
>it seems more like an editorial function than a publishing function to
>dispatch errata to the streams and ensure that they eventually reply.
Errata does not have anything to do with the production of a
RFC. The process is basically to:
(i) Accept the report
(ii) Send a message to the relevant stream about the report
(iii) Update the status of report (accepted, rejected, etc.)
There isn't any editorial work performed at the RFC Editor side.
More information about the rfc-interest