[rfc-i] The errata issue [Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher]

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Sat Aug 17 20:00:50 PDT 2013

On 18/08/2013 14:49, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Aug 17, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The issue is what RFC 6635 *doesn't* say. It doesn't assign the
>> responsibility for the follow-up of errata reports. That involves
>> interaction with the authors and the relevant RFC stream, and that
>> sort of interaction is normally coordinated by the Production Center.
> This is handled by the IESG at the moment, unless I am missing something.

For the IETF stream, certainly. But there are three other streams, and
it seems more like an editorial function than a publishing function to
dispatch errata to the streams and ensure that they eventually reply.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list