[rfc-i] The errata issue [Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher]

Ted Lemon mellon at fugue.com
Sat Aug 17 19:49:20 PDT 2013


On Aug 17, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:
> The issue is what RFC 6635 *doesn't* say. It doesn't assign the
> responsibility for the follow-up of errata reports. That involves
> interaction with the authors and the relevant RFC stream, and that
> sort of interaction is normally coordinated by the Production Center.

This is handled by the IESG at the moment, unless I am missing something.



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list