[rfc-i] Updating drafts that are in the RFC Editor's queue?

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Tue Apr 23 08:46:49 PDT 2013


On 2013-04-23 17:29, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 05:12:00PM +0200,
>   Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote
>   a message of 17 lines which said:
>
>> That being said: *if* changes are needed for a draft in the queue,
>> doing so by actually posting a new draft seems to be much better
>> approach then doing it in AUTH48 (during which few people pay
>> attention).
>
> I don't think it would be a good idea.
>
>>From my experience, bugs in approved I-D (entering the RFC Editor
> queue) are common (most of the times editorial, sometimes
> technical). The process to publish a RFC is already quite heavy and
> requiring one more step (when the I-D has already been translated to
> nroff and so on) would seriously slow the system.

I was speaking of the phase *before* the RFC production center starts to 
work on it (thus before "RFC-EDITOR" and "AUTH48").

Best regards, Julian




More information about the rfc-interest mailing list