[rfc-i] Scanning non-ASCII text
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Fri Sep 28 08:25:47 PDT 2012
On Sep 28, 2012, at 6:26 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam at gmail.com> wrote:
> What I very much would like to see however is the electronic signatures be embedded in the document.
A big -1 to that. They add no value to 99.999% of people reading an RFC, and some software will mark RFCs that have inconsequential bits flipped as "invalid" or "dangerous" or some such.
> At the moment the RFCs are signed and this helps with various court demands for production (note that I say helps not solves).
You have absolutely no evidence of that, do you?
More information about the rfc-interest