[rfc-i] Scanning non-ASCII text

[Paul Hoffman]

On Sep 28, 2012, at 6:26 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam at gmail.com> wrote:

> What I very much would like to see however is the electronic signatures be embedded in the document.

A big -1 to that. They add no value to 99.999% of people reading an RFC, and some software will mark RFCs that have inconsequential bits flipped as "invalid" or "dangerous" or some such.

> At the moment the RFCs are signed and this helps with various court demands for production (note that I say helps not solves).

You have absolutely no evidence of that, do you? 

--Paul Hoffman