dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue Sep 25 11:43:02 PDT 2012
On 9/25/2012 11:18 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> So, you think the entry for the word in Wikipedia is inappropriate for
>> 99% of the people who use the term?
> In this context, yes.
It's always fun to go through the exercise of defining a market segment
carefully enough to produce exactly the demographic one wishes.
The only problem is when it eliminates relevant actors.
>> The fact that most people on the consumer side do not have to deal with
>> structural metadata does not justify using the term to exclude that use.
> Correct. In fact, no one suggested that structural metadata be excluded for any reason.
Then I don't understand what you are proposing.
More information about the rfc-interest