[rfc-i] Reasons for going beyond ASCII art

Andrew G. Malis agmalis at gmail.com
Sat Sep 22 00:47:11 PDT 2012


Paul,

Here's an example:

https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-stein-pwe3-congcons-01.pdf

Cheers,
Andy

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Ole Jacobsen <ole at cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> How about the *output* from the "complex equations", I can see a need
>> to be able to include something that, say, looks like a sine-wave or
>> exponential graph.
>
> Sure, that would be useful. However, if you count the number of RFCs that have hard-to-read state diagrams and protocol flow diagrams, I suspect that "equations" and "equation graphs" are an order of magnitude less common.
>
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list