[rfc-i] RFC Format requirements draft
dhc at dcrocker.net
Fri Sep 21 14:36:24 PDT 2012
On 9/21/2012 12:57 PM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
>> If I am not mistaken, the current requirements are described in 2223bis.
> Actually, that's an interesting question that came up while we were
> drafting the document. Given that 2223bis was never published, is it
> appropriate to refer to that document? Half the folks said yes, half
> said no.
Just as it is sometimes reasonable to refer to a person's comments, it
should be reasonable to refer to an unpublished document. Imparting
formal status to its content would, of course, be quite a different
>> "Will allow better support for international authors, in
>> particular allowing authors to spell their names in their
>> native character sets."
>> It's better not to call them "international authors". It makes
>> existing authors sound provincial. :-)
> I see your point, but saying "non-US or other people with a tiny
> alphabet" didn't sound good either. Any suggestions?
international character sets.
(sometimes even americans use them...)
More information about the rfc-interest