[rfc-i] (bogus) arguments against reflowable text

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Fri Sep 21 09:10:49 PDT 2012


 From <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rfc-format-flanagan-00#section-2.1>:

>    Arguments against allowing for reflowable text:
>
>       *  Reflowable text may impact the usability of graphics and tables
>          within a document.

That's FUD; of course the format needs to distinguish text from 
graphics, tables, and preformatted text (such as code), so that it 
reflows properly. No rocket science at all.

Best regards, Julian


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list