[rfc-i] (bogus) arguments against reflowable text
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Fri Sep 21 09:10:49 PDT 2012
> Arguments against allowing for reflowable text:
> * Reflowable text may impact the usability of graphics and tables
> within a document.
That's FUD; of course the format needs to distinguish text from
graphics, tables, and preformatted text (such as code), so that it
reflows properly. No rocket science at all.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest