[rfc-i] Technical changes after AUTH48

Dave Crocker dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue Oct 16 08:07:01 PDT 2012

On 10/16/2012 7:40 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>  These are not small changes: a protocol state
> is added,

On 10/16/2012 7:55 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
 > In practice, this is a judgement call by the AD (is the scope of
 > changes reasonable, is the community consensus clear, was this just an
 > oversight, etc.).

In practice, I'm sure you are right that something like this is treated 
as a judgement call.

It shouldn't be.

Paul's specific text, above, makes this something that is very, very far 
over the line into obviously requiring being kicked back to the working 

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list