[rfc-i] Technical changes after AUTH48

Dave Crocker dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue Oct 16 08:07:01 PDT 2012



On 10/16/2012 7:40 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>  These are not small changes: a protocol state
> is added,


On 10/16/2012 7:55 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
 > In practice, this is a judgement call by the AD (is the scope of
 > changes reasonable, is the community consensus clear, was this just an
 > oversight, etc.).


In practice, I'm sure you are right that something like this is treated 
as a judgement call.

It shouldn't be.

Paul's specific text, above, makes this something that is very, very far 
over the line into obviously requiring being kicked back to the working 
group.

d/
-- 
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list