[rfc-i] Technical changes after AUTH48
dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue Oct 16 08:07:01 PDT 2012
On 10/16/2012 7:40 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> These are not small changes: a protocol state
> is added,
On 10/16/2012 7:55 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> In practice, this is a judgement call by the AD (is the scope of
> changes reasonable, is the community consensus clear, was this just an
> oversight, etc.).
In practice, I'm sure you are right that something like this is treated
as a judgement call.
It shouldn't be.
Paul's specific text, above, makes this something that is very, very far
over the line into obviously requiring being kicked back to the working
More information about the rfc-interest