[rfc-i] Technical changes after AUTH48
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Tue Oct 16 07:49:03 PDT 2012
On Oct 16, 2012, at 7:44 AM, Pelletier Ray <rpelletier at isoc.org> wrote:
> I'm surprised this question is being asked. I thought only editorial changes were made at this stage.
Then you haven't been reading the diffs between the final drafts and RFCs over the years. Technical changes are made, although not "often".
> Sounds like the doc isn't finished and should be sent back for the proposed addition of new substantive material and the appropriate list given the opportunity to comment, then back to the IESG and then to the RFC Editor.
This causes another delay in publishing a valuable document that is, in many people's eyes, already overdue. Thus my question.
More information about the rfc-interest