[rfc-i] Comments about draft-flanagan-style-00

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Sun Nov 11 12:21:56 PST 2012


On 2012-11-11 18:39, SM wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> At 09:20 11-11-2012, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Also, the former citations committee discussed the phrase "Work in
>> Progress"
>> at some length. It is inaccurate when applied to work that has long
>> been abandoned, and we suggested that "Working Draft" would make
>> more sense in such cases.
>
> How about "Expired Draft"?  "Working Draft" does not convey the idea
> that the work has been abandoned.

"Expired Draft" would only work for ... expired drafts. Is it worth to 
introduce that distinction?




More information about the rfc-interest mailing list