[rfc-i] "wysiwyg" requirement

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Sat Nov 10 16:17:44 PST 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/10/12 4:09 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2012-11-10 03:29, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
>> Heather,
>> 
>> Two comments that were missed in the minutes:
>> 
>> 1. Stefan was thanked for his work on NroffEdit.
>> 
>> 2. If the revisable format changes from nroff, RFC authors will
>> need WYSIWYG editing tools at least as easy to use as NroffEdit.

That was a comment that one person made, not a requirement on the format.

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlCe7qgACgkQNL8k5A2w/vymFACg8KmVlca1QMbUApvFAMBKSqBb
0+AAn3pIdJLyrwXLI9Ey2wr79ziBl4r5
=q/jp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list