[rfc-i] "wysiwyg" requirement
Peter Saint-Andre
stpeter at stpeter.im
Sat Nov 10 16:17:44 PST 2012
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/10/12 4:09 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2012-11-10 03:29, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
>> Heather,
>>
>> Two comments that were missed in the minutes:
>>
>> 1. Stefan was thanked for his work on NroffEdit.
>>
>> 2. If the revisable format changes from nroff, RFC authors will
>> need WYSIWYG editing tools at least as easy to use as NroffEdit.
That was a comment that one person made, not a requirement on the format.
Peter
- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlCe7qgACgkQNL8k5A2w/vymFACg8KmVlca1QMbUApvFAMBKSqBb
0+AAn3pIdJLyrwXLI9Ey2wr79ziBl4r5
=q/jp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the rfc-interest
mailing list