[rfc-i] "wysiwyg" requirement
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Sat Nov 10 03:09:32 PST 2012
On 2012-11-10 03:29, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
> Two comments that were missed in the minutes:
> 1. Stefan was thanked for his work on NroffEdit.
> 2. If the revisable format changes from nroff, RFC authors will need
> WYSIWYG editing tools at least as easy to use as NroffEdit.
But then, a WYSIWYG editor is much simpler if all it needs to support is
our old format.
Furthermore, "what you see is what you get" also can mean "what you see
is *all* you get". So what's important is that it's easy to edit the
document's structure, not to be able to preview the result in
72-characters-per-line fixed-width font format.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest