[rfc-i] RFC Format: Update from IETF85
Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
rse at rfc-editor.org
Thu Nov 8 15:26:34 PST 2012
On 11/8/12 6:19 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 11/8/2012 6:12 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote:
>> On 11/8/12 5:37 PM, "Dave Crocker" <dhc at dcrocker.net> wrote:
>>> you want me to be specific and unambiguous? damn. that's no fun...
>> Heather has found your kryptonite. :)
> i'm pretty sure that superman's reaction was a bit worse than merely
> feeling hassled.
> but maybe you're right...
>>> but just to appease your absurdly unreasonable demand that I be clear:
>>> Variable-width fonts are only permitted for free-running
>>> prose in paragraphs.
>> Or the alternate formulation:
>> Fixed-width fonts are required for ASCII-art sections, source
>> code examples, and other places where strict alignment is required.
>> Your text above might mean that section headings are fixed-width. The
> she asked for examples, not for my recommendations of what the
> specifics should be. i tried to formulate text that was credible, but
> didn't worry about their being acceptable.
> I'm glad to join you in nit-picking the details of Heather's actual,
> proffered text, when she formulates the type of contingent
> requirements I suggest.
Nitpicking is of course always welcome as we aim for clear, unambiguous
text, which if we used colors would obviously have to glow a certain
shade of green at this point.
I'll continue to work on clarification and sanity.
More information about the rfc-interest