[rfc-i] RFC Format: Update from IETF85

Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) rse at rfc-editor.org
Thu Nov 8 13:42:51 PST 2012

On 11/8/12 4:21 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 11/8/2012 4:05 PM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
>> There were more interesting points made; the above list were some of the
>> highlights for me.  The rest of the points captured will be posted in
>> the minutes in the next few days.
> I'll suggest one more, because it seemed to me to be a meta-point:
>    A number of issues are contingent. A requirement applies to some
> cases and not others.  Being careful to specify the constrains for
> applying such requirements is a hassle both to the specifier and the
> reader, but I fear it is essential.

Hi Dave,

I am pretty sure I know what you mean but to verify, would you provide
an example, please?


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list