[rfc-i] open issues: character sets of examples
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Thu May 31 12:48:43 PDT 2012
On 31 May 2012, at 20:02 , Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> "Ah," the counter-argument says, "but not everyone is using Unicode!"
> Surely, however, this is a case where an encoding tag solves that
> problem? We seem to be capable of handling this in nearly every
> browser I have seen in many years.
Again, I'm not necessarily against non-latin forms of names, address and examples in addition to the latin forms (but never as a replacement!) but you have to recognize that Unicode is not universally supported correctly.
At least once a week I run into websites where the non-ASCII characters are messed up because the author of the page used UTF-8 while my browser thinks the page is in Latin-1 or the other way around. And once the Unicode starts getting interesting, the little square box that indicates the character in question isn't available typically makes an appearance or two.
More information about the rfc-interest