[rfc-i] Substantial revision
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Tue May 29 12:28:57 PDT 2012
On 29 May 2012, at 18:43 , Joe Touch wrote:
> Change control can be useful for IDs (using the author's source, which might support revision), but very few RFCs are ever "bis'd", and benefit from a clean-slate revision more than mere incremental editing. I.e., revision support may be useful for author source, but isn't relevant for either the submission or output formats.
Sometimes wgs replace authors. It would be good if a new author can continue working on the version of a draft that was submitted rather than redo some of the work.
More information about the rfc-interest