[rfc-i] I18N constraints
jhildebr at cisco.com
Tue May 29 10:26:53 PDT 2012
On 5/29/12 11:13 AM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
> the tension is not in trying to do what the ACM/IEEE commonly do,
> going so far above and beyond that the result is - at best - a
> project for library science folk.
What is basic research for some might be well-accepted industry practice for
others. For example, the fact that there are multiple ways to mark up
semantics in HTML is an example that this part is not research, but instead
an area of competing standards proposals. It is exactly the kind of work at
which the IETF should excel.
More information about the rfc-interest