[rfc-i] Better markup may get processed faster
jhildebr at cisco.com
Tue May 29 10:09:31 PDT 2012
On 5/29/12 10:45 AM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
> Sure, but the delay for checking
> grammar and spelling is a similar - but
much more common (all docs need such
> checks, vs. a subsetfor ABNF or code).
Grammar and spelling can be checked by people with copy-editing skills.
ABNF requires a skillet that is not as common in that population.
Think about the cost of the people involved.
> Optimizing for these sorts of things
> is a good way to end up with a
system that is complex enough to result in
> delays elsewhere too.
(https://github.com/hildjj/node-abnf). It wasn't that complex.
Could you give an example of the sorts of the delays you're worried about?
I'm concerned that this might have been an off-the-cuff statement without
any technical basis.
More information about the rfc-interest