[rfc-i] ISBN and DOI

["Martin J. Dürst"]

On 2012/05/28 23:57, John R Levine wrote:

> Fun fact: the DOI group claims they want doi: URIs, but apparently
> nobody involved has gotten around to writing a draft and running it
> through the process. Maybe we could offer to do it for them, in exchange
> for 20,000 free DOIs for the next decade's RFCs.

Might be a good deal for us. But the reason nobody is keen on writing 
that RFC is that in this case, http: is mostly good enough, and getting 
doi: deployed would be really tough.

Regards,   Martin.