[rfc-i] Proposed new RFC submission requirements

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Mon May 28 08:43:46 PDT 2012


On 2012-05-28 17:38, Joe Touch wrote:
>
> On May 28, 2012, at 3:17 AM, Peter Sylvester wrote:
>
>> On 05/28/2012 04:47 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
>>>
>>> Source formats should be up to the author.
>> As long as the transformation to whatever intermediate format insures
>> reversibility of information and structure when I want to create
>> a new version.
>
> The entire publishing community - including the research community - recognizes that access to source format does not impede the ability to write new material even when it reuses previous material.
>
> New documents shouldn't be minor revisions of existing docs. They often need to be substantially revised in content anyway, structurally reorganized, etc.
> ...

Hmm. I don't think this is true for the case where we go from Draft to 
Full Standard.

Best regards, Julian


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list