[rfc-i] Proposed new RFC submission requirements
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Mon May 28 08:43:46 PDT 2012
On 2012-05-28 17:38, Joe Touch wrote:
> On May 28, 2012, at 3:17 AM, Peter Sylvester wrote:
>> On 05/28/2012 04:47 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
>>> Source formats should be up to the author.
>> As long as the transformation to whatever intermediate format insures
>> reversibility of information and structure when I want to create
>> a new version.
> The entire publishing community - including the research community - recognizes that access to source format does not impede the ability to write new material even when it reuses previous material.
> New documents shouldn't be minor revisions of existing docs. They often need to be substantially revised in content anyway, structurally reorganized, etc.
Hmm. I don't think this is true for the case where we go from Draft to
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest