[rfc-i] Proposed new RFC submission requirements

Joe Hildebrand jhildebr at cisco.com
Sun May 27 21:04:05 PDT 2012


On 5/27/12 9:51 PM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:

>> I'd suggest that checking is something that would most effeciently be
>> supplied to the submission format.
> 
> You probably meant 'applied'.

Yes. Thank you for the manual grammar check.

> Such checks are best available to the author. Just as in emails like this.

You might have meant "best made available".

-- 
Joe Hildebrand



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list