[rfc-i] Proposed new RFC submission requirements
jhildebr at cisco.com
Sun May 27 21:04:05 PDT 2012
On 5/27/12 9:51 PM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
>> I'd suggest that checking is something that would most effeciently be
>> supplied to the submission format.
> You probably meant 'applied'.
Yes. Thank you for the manual grammar check.
> Such checks are best available to the author. Just as in emails like this.
You might have meant "best made available".
More information about the rfc-interest