[rfc-i] Proposed new RFC submission requirements
touch at isi.edu
Sun May 27 20:51:10 PDT 2012
On May 27, 2012, at 8:14 PM, Joe Hildebrand <jhildebr at cisco.com> wrote:
> On 5/27/12 8:47 PM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
>> Source formats should be up to the author.
>> All formats may need to have components checked. That need not be native to
>> the format.
> I'd suggest that checking is something that would most effeciently be
> supplied to the submission format.
You probably meant 'applied'.
Such checks are best available to the author. Just as in emails like this.
More information about the rfc-interest