[rfc-i] Who uses Word, was Proposed new RFC submission requirements

John R Levine johnl at taugh.com
Sun May 27 11:40:57 PDT 2012


> I grepped for that string, and found it in eight documents starting at RFC 
> 5282, or slightly under 0.5% of the last two thousand RFCs.

Sorry, that should be slightly over 0.5% of the last 1500 RFCs.

Nonetheless,

> It's hard to see a "requirement" to cripple the RFC format to support 
> such a little used and semantically deficient editing tool.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl at taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list