[rfc-i] Proposed new RFC submission requirements
jhildebr at cisco.com
Sun May 27 11:36:05 PDT 2012
On 5/27/12 12:15 PM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
> The format should be optimized for longevity first, utility of the output
> formats second, and flexibility of the author tools third.
I agree with this, so I'm not sure why benefits to the utility of the output
formats are something you keep arguing against.
>> Have you ever shepherded a document? Did you check code and references?
> Yeah, but I didn't expect the tools to optimize that effort.
More information about the rfc-interest