[rfc-i] Proposed new RFC submission requirements

Joe Hildebrand jhildebr at cisco.com
Sun May 27 11:36:05 PDT 2012


On 5/27/12 12:15 PM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:

> The format should be optimized for longevity first, utility of the output
> formats second, and flexibility of the author tools third.

I agree with this, so I'm not sure why benefits to the utility of the output
formats are something you keep arguing against.

>> Have you ever shepherded a document? Did you check code and references?
> 
> Yeah, but I didn't expect the tools to optimize that effort.

Dream bigger?

-- 
Joe Hildebrand



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list