[rfc-i] Who uses Word, was Proposed new RFC submission requirements

[Yoav Nir]

On May 27, 2012, at 5:05 PM, John Levine wrote:

>> And why exactly should that influence our choices? Because one tool 
>> generates bad HTML that's what our baseline will be?
> 
> I'm getting the impression that there is only one remaining author of
> I-Ds who uses Word.  I don't see anything from the authors of RFC
> 3285 more recently than five years ago.  That would put Word support
> in the same category as, say, teco support, nice to have but not worth
> any effort by anyone other than the teco user.
> 
> How many people use Word to write I-Ds?  Feel free to speak up.  If
> your name is Joe, please don't, we already know that you use it.

I use XML2RFC, but look at section 10 of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements-01