On 5/27/12 1:54 AM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote: > We have an ISSN for the RFC series (2070-1721). It's not proved very useful, > but in library circles it conveys some sort of respectability. > > I'm unclear what would be the benefit of the admin overhead of an ISBN > per RFC. +1 -- Joe Hildebrand