Brian E Carpenter
brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Sun May 27 00:54:14 PDT 2012
> However, having an ISBN for an RFC seems completely in the spirit
> of ISBNs. We might need a separate one for each format that we publish, if
> we think ISBNs are really useful.
We have an ISSN for the RFC series (2070-1721). It's not proved very useful,
but in library circles it conveys some sort of respectability.
I'm unclear what would be the benefit of the admin overhead of an ISBN
More information about the rfc-interest