[rfc-i] Towards Consensus

[Joe Hildebrand]

On 5/26/12 6:55 PM, "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam at gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't think there is much dispute as to the value of included source
> files. Since the technical demands for images would be identical, can't we
> just agree for the sake of argument that we are going to be dealing with a
> compound document and defer the discussion of which ones we are going to
> support?

I'm not convinced of the need for compound documents yet.  data: works for
images, inline CSS for styles, and source code can be easily extracted if
it's marked up adequately.

> We have had ABNF and XML Schema in RFCs for ages. It would be nice if we
> had tools that could check syntax and nits for those as well as the main
> text.

+1

-- 
Joe Hildebrand