[rfc-i] Proposed new RFC submission requirements
jhildebr at cisco.com
Sat May 26 20:18:17 PDT 2012
No. I insist that you conduct yourself with appropriate decorum.
I will note that your apology is also sarcastic and condescending, so I
remain explicitly offended.
On 5/26/12 8:40 PM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
> if you are offended by my use of caps, i apologize. in case i forget, and
> since you're fond of filters, feel free to run my posts through an ee-cummings
> filter in the future.
> On May 26, 2012, at 10:44 AM, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
>> On 5/26/12 10:31 AM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
>>> Agreed. SO WHAT?
>>> Why are you insisting on retaining that structure? What is the *current*
>>> ***NECESSARY*** purpose?
>> I'll reply to your points in a separate message, but if we had a chair that
>> was running this like a working group, I'd ask them to ask you not to yell.
>> There's no need for this sort of ill-mannered speech, particularly when I'm
>> trying to bend over backwards to be polite.
>> Also: I won't be bullied by all-caps, so it's an ineffective approach.
>> Joe Hildebrand
More information about the rfc-interest