[rfc-i] Proposed new RFC submission requirements

[Joe Hildebrand]

On 5/26/12 9:42 AM, "Russ Housley" <housley at vigilsec.com> wrote:

> Joe:
> 
>>> - for code like ABNF: type information
>> 
>> Again, why? The heading that marks it, sure, but why any different from
>> fig/table/example?
> 
> Code can be extracted from an I-D or RFC under a different license than text.
> Clear differentiation of code and text would be very helpful.

That's a great example, and points out a need for us to have an orthogonal
HTML class for license markup - luckily that's easy enough to add.  Example:

<pre class='code language-c license-apache'>
int main() {return 0;}
</pre>

-- 
Joe Hildebrand