[rfc-i] Proposed new RFC submission requirements
jhildebr at cisco.com
Fri May 25 23:10:29 PDT 2012
On 5/25/12 11:47 PM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
> If it requires denoting the full document structure, that's hard to
> impossible, and not clear why that would/should be a requirement.
Can you give a couple of reasons why you think this is "impossible"? It
seems pretty straightforward to me, so maybe you've thought of a problem I
haven't, since I assume that you wouldn't use a word as strong as
"impossible" without a really good reason.
More information about the rfc-interest