[rfc-i] Pagination requirements
jhildebr at cisco.com
Fri May 25 23:06:48 PDT 2012
On 5/25/12 8:02 PM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
>> That's trivial with containment.
> That's trivial in general using diff and search.
I really don't understand why this is so difficult to explain.
<div class='section' id='security'>
Think about the code that would be required to pull out "Para 1 Para 2 Para
3". In the contained version, it's just $("div#security").text(), and
you're done. In the flat version, you'd need to write a bunch of code that
basically implemented the HTML5 section rules, or turn it into the contained
version first (which might actually be easier).
> It has nothing to do with
> containment unless containment is retained across reuses - which it likely
> will not be.
I really don't understand that statement. Why would the containment change
over time? Once the file is published, it's immutable.
More information about the rfc-interest