[rfc-i] Pagination requirements

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Fri May 25 09:25:32 PDT 2012


On 2012-05-25 17:16, Joe Touch wrote:
> ...
> This is interesting academically, but if this isn't what is mostly used (and hasn't been for a long time, AFAICT), why *introduce* it as a format requirement?
>
> We should *minimize* the requirements, to reduce risk for the future.
>
> I agree it would be nice to retain the entire doc structure for future authors, but other than authorship - which can be VERY easily re-formatted in a modern editor - there doesn't seem to be necessary utility to containment tagging.
> ...

Could you explain the *advantage* of losing the containment?


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list