[rfc-i] Pagination requirements
"Martin J. Dürst"
duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Thu May 24 23:54:16 PDT 2012
On 2012/05/25 7:16, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> On 5/24/12 3:04 PM, "Joe Touch"<touch at isi.edu> wrote:
>> As Iljitsch noted, e.g., the current XML uses nested tags that Word has
>> trouble generating. If we look more at what kind of stuff Word DOES
>> generate, that's a hint at what might be feasible in Word.
> It's a reasonable discussion to have whether sections contain sections, or
> whether we just use the heading number (h1-h6) to intuit relationships. I
> don't have a strong preference. The CSS is probably a *little* easier with
> containing, but it's doable either way.
It would be a pity if we lost containment. If there's a problem for
Word, I'm quite sure a post-processing script (similar to the one that's
used currently) will be able to fix things.
More information about the rfc-interest