[rfc-i] Pagination requirements
touch at isi.edu
Thu May 24 13:38:31 PDT 2012
On 5/24/2012 11:54 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2012-05-24 20:35, Joe Touch wrote:
>>> But they are shifted inconsistently when part of the indentation uses
>>> characters which are not the same width.
>> I changed the txt to Times (i.e., this isn't from the source file, but
>> from the txt) - see here:
>> It seems to indent fine enough.
> Depends on what you call "fine enough".
> In the second line, the first word ("traffic") clearly is not aligned
> with the line above ("Compute").
Yeah, I consider that more than fine enough.
> Things get worse when you have labeled indentations.
The subsequent lines get indented differently than the first, but it's
consistent. That can be fixed a number of ways, not the least of which
is having the source generate indentations that align all the text,
rather than trying to indent to match the label, e.g.:
a. one two three...
four five six...
seven eight nine
More information about the rfc-interest