[rfc-i] Pagination requirements
jhildebr at cisco.com
Thu May 24 13:01:19 PDT 2012
On 5/24/12 12:08 PM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
> I think this whole thread went off the rails by claiming that the
> canonical format would need to satisfy the output requirements.
Hm. I thought I was careful to phrase that as a preference of mine, and to
give a reason, which was so that I could ensure that the canonical format
was as close to my intent as possible.
However, I've talked with enough folks about this that apologize if I wasn't
clear about that on this list.
> If that's off the table (and I hope it is), maybe we can make progress.
It's still a preference of mine, but as I said in another mail, as long as
the submission format has adequate markup to produce good HTML, I'd be
willing to accept non-HTML submission formats.
More information about the rfc-interest