[rfc-i] Pagination requirements
stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu May 24 11:10:40 PDT 2012
On 5/24/12 12:08 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
> On 5/24/2012 11:04 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> If we are able to move to a model in which multiple output formats can
>> be produced, then we can vastly improve the experience for those who
>> aren't attached to printed words on "the paper device", while not
>> degrading the print experience since one of the output formats would be
>> exactly what we produce today (or some reasonable facsimile).
> I think this whole thread went off the rails by claiming that the
> canonical format would need to satisfy the output requirements.
Clarifying question: by "canonical format" do you mean the input format
or the output format?
> If that's off the table (and I hope it is), maybe we can make progress.
I hope so!
More information about the rfc-interest