[rfc-i] Pagination requirements

Joe Hildebrand jhildebr at cisco.com
Thu May 24 08:30:41 PDT 2012


On 5/24/12 9:21 AM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:

> I gave them but you dismissed them as aesthetic.

Could you please just reiterate them very quickly in a few words?  The ones
I remember were:

- page numbers that were consistent across browsers (dealt with by not
needing page number references)
- page numbers in the table of contents (no answer yet in current browsers)
- widows and orphans (no answer yet in current browsers, but more aesthetic,
unless you can articulate a functional issue)
- examples splitting page boundaries (answered with page-break-inside:
avoid)

What am I missing?

-- 
Joe Hildebrand



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list