[rfc-i] Pagination requirements
Joe Hildebrand
jhildebr at cisco.com
Thu May 24 08:30:41 PDT 2012
On 5/24/12 9:21 AM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
> I gave them but you dismissed them as aesthetic.
Could you please just reiterate them very quickly in a few words? The ones
I remember were:
- page numbers that were consistent across browsers (dealt with by not
needing page number references)
- page numbers in the table of contents (no answer yet in current browsers)
- widows and orphans (no answer yet in current browsers, but more aesthetic,
unless you can articulate a functional issue)
- examples splitting page boundaries (answered with page-break-inside:
avoid)
What am I missing?
--
Joe Hildebrand
More information about the rfc-interest
mailing list