[rfc-i] Pagination requirements

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu May 24 08:21:22 PDT 2012


On 5/24/12 9:18 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
> 
> 
> On May 24, 2012, at 8:07 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>> On 2012-05-24 16:58, Joe Touch wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 23, 2012, at 9:10 PM, Joe Hildebrand<jhildebr at cisco.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/23/12 4:36 PM, "Joe Touch"<touch at isi.edu>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm channeling the "I don't ever want to print it out, so I don't care
>>>>> how pretty it is" response *I* just received, in case the sarcasm wasn't
>>>>> apparent...
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps you misunderstood my question then.  I want to know what functional
>>>> requirements you're missing from HTML printouts today.  That's a far cry
>>>> from saying I don't care how pretty it is.
>>>
>>> I don't agree with your question. Or maybe I should just turn it around - what *functional* requirements does txt not meet on smartphones?
>>
>> Readability?
> 
> Right.  You want to trade your inconvenience for mine. No thanks.

HTML is inconvenient?

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/




More information about the rfc-interest mailing list