[rfc-i] Pagination requirements
jhildebr at cisco.com
Thu May 24 07:19:50 PDT 2012
On 5/24/12 8:08 AM, "Martin Rex" <mrex at sap.com> wrote:
> Since creating tools for a HTML-based future authoring format
> will require a lot of work, a lot of time, and plenty of bugfixing,
> how about a limited evaluation test for those who need this so
> badly, of a few I-Ds being authored and additionally made available
> in a new format? If the new authoring format is so much more powerful
> and flexible than the existing, then it should be simple to render it
> additionally in the traditional 72col 56line fixed pitch format that
> works smoothly with all of the _existing_ tools.
I don't have a problem with that. It's pretty straightforward code,
although it might be easier to go through xml2rfc format to get there if you
want to pass nit checks.
More information about the rfc-interest