[rfc-i] Pagination requirements

Joe Hildebrand jhildebr at cisco.com
Thu May 24 07:19:50 PDT 2012


On 5/24/12 8:08 AM, "Martin Rex" <mrex at sap.com> wrote:

> Since creating tools for a HTML-based future authoring format
> will require a lot of work, a lot of time, and plenty of bugfixing,
> how about a limited evaluation test for those who need this so
> badly, of a few I-Ds being authored and additionally made available
> in a new format?   If the new authoring format is so much more powerful
> and flexible than the existing, then it should be simple to render it
> additionally in the traditional 72col 56line fixed pitch format that
> works smoothly with all of the _existing_ tools.

I don't have a problem with that.  It's pretty straightforward code,
although it might be easier to go through xml2rfc format to get there if you
want to pass nit checks.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list