[rfc-i] Pagination requirements

[Martin Rex]

Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
> >
> > It often *IS* much better, in particular with the existing RFCs.
> 
> We are discussing future RFCs-
> 
> > Refering to a specific element from an ASN.1 module or other data
> > in the appendix of an RFC would be awkward without page numbers,
> > e.g. the ASN.1 definition of a CRL in PKIX/rfc5280:
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#page-118
> 
> What if the URI would be
> 
>    http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#ABNF-CRL
> 
> instead?


Unusable, because it will not work for a printed copy.


-Martin