[rfc-i] Pagination requirements
mrex at sap.com
Tue May 22 15:33:23 PDT 2012
Julian Reschke wrote:
> > It often *IS* much better, in particular with the existing RFCs.
> We are discussing future RFCs-
> > Refering to a specific element from an ASN.1 module or other data
> > in the appendix of an RFC would be awkward without page numbers,
> > e.g. the ASN.1 definition of a CRL in PKIX/rfc5280:
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#page-118
> What if the URI would be
Unusable, because it will not work for a printed copy.
More information about the rfc-interest