[rfc-i] feedback on draft-hoffman-rfcformat-canon-others-00, was: RFC Format - final requirements and next steps
Brian E Carpenter
brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Fri May 18 00:36:04 PDT 2012
On 2012-05-17 23:50, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On May 17, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
>> I'm saying that Sec 2 says nothing about how those items are indicated. If that's the intent, then it should be stated.
>> I.e., why are paragraphs defined, but none of the others?
>> Do you mean that "all text items - paragraphs, headings, list items, etc." are unwrapped text excluding CR/NL characters?
> Yes. And you're right: I should be more explicit. I'll add this to the next draft.
I would prefer that CR/NL/LF/TAB are allowed but treated as a single space.
Isn't that how they are treated in *ML anyway?
This is very helpful when editing marked up text in a plain ASCII editor.
Some of us do that, you know ;-)
More information about the rfc-interest