[rfc-i] RFC Format - final requirements and next steps
Paul E. Jones
paulej at packetizer.com
Wed May 16 21:30:53 PDT 2012
I actually do agree that page numbers should go, but people can make an
argument for why section numbers are not suitable. Even in a section that
spans just a few pages, it can be hard to direct people to exactly the right
I think the right solution is to have numbers on each paragraph. I would
not want them visible, but have them in the document so they can be
referenced. Certain tools might even display them (including some web sites
that do further massaging of the RFCs for presentation).
I might be mistaken, but I think that's how Kindle numbers locations, too.
It's a bit odd, but workable. (And, yes, the general public screamed for
page numbers and I wish Amazon had not caved on that. Now there are page
numbers on my Kindle for which I have no use... they span several
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org [mailto:rfc-interest-
> bounces at rfc-editor.org] On Behalf Of Phillip Hallam-Baker
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 12:15 AM
> To: Bjoern Hoehrmann
> Cc: Julian Reschke; rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> Subject: Re: [rfc-i] RFC Format - final requirements and next steps
> Page numbers met a certain need in dead tree technology. They don't meet
> that need at all well for modern technology.
> When I create cross references within a document they are always to a
> particular section. It is very rare that section numbers offer less
> granularity than page numbers in any case.
> So when is a section number going to be worse?
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi at gmx.net>
> > * Martin Rex wrote:
> >>Page numbers are extremely useful!
> > I remember being confused about this the very first time we were to
> > read some book for school and ... were supposed to buy one particular
> > edition of it, even if we had the book already, just so the page numbers
> > Then I learned that books that are often used in school are regularily
> > updated in ways that slightly change the page numbers. Found that funny.
> > --
> > Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern at hoehrmann.de ·
> > http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681
> > · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
> > 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 ·
> > http://www.websitedev.de/
> > _______________________________________________
> > rfc-interest mailing list
> > rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
> Website: http://hallambaker.com/
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
More information about the rfc-interest