[rfc-i] RFC Format - final requirements and next steps
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Wed May 16 00:43:00 PDT 2012
On 2012-05-16 00:34, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> That is true. Is that a problem? If people choose to use an ugly type face:
>> their problem.
> It may or may not be a problem. In the web world it most certainly IS
> a problem because pages are OFTEN designed (intelligently or not) for
> a specific font/size, heck even browser. When this design 'intent'
> clashes with whatever I (stupidly, by default, or otherwise) chose to
> set as "my environment" then we get real functional problems, like
> the "login" button is hidden behind the word "foo" or whatever.
If changing fonts breaks the page design so badly than the page itself
has a problem.
>>> Justification for example, italics for example, indentation for
>> OK. I don't think we have discussed this in detail so far.
> Indeed we have not, but we ARE talking about documents and some people
> on this list seem to think that format, design etc are not important.
>> Then you may be talking to designers who haven't understood how to design for
>> different output devices.
> With an almost infinite combination of enviroments, user settings and
> so on, this is EXTREMELY difficult to do well.
It depends a lot on how "fancy" you want the design to be.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest