[rfc-i] Pagination requirements
Peter Saint-Andre
stpeter at stpeter.im
Tue May 15 15:04:21 PDT 2012
On 5/15/12 4:02 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2012-05-16 00:00, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> ...
>> P.S. Here's a relevant paragraph from a discussion about visually
>> similar characters in the security considerations of an I-D I'm working
>> on (draft-ietf-precis-framework)...
>>
>> However, the problem is made more serious by introducing the full
>> range of Unicode code points into protocol strings. For example, the
>> characters U+13DA U+13A2 U+13B5 U+13AC U+13A2 U+13AC U+13D2 from the
>> Cherokee block look similar to the US-ASCII characters "STPETER" as
>> they might look when presented in a "creative" font.
>>
>> It would be helpful to include the actual characters, not just the
>> Unicode codepoint numbers:
>>
>> However, the problem is made more serious by introducing the full
>> range of Unicode code points into protocol strings. For example, the
>> characters U+13DA U+13A2 U+13B5 U+13AC U+13A2 U+13AC U+13D2 from the
>> Cherokee block, i.e., "ᏚᎢᎵᏋᎢᏋᏒ", look similar to the US-ASCII
>> characters "STPETER" as they might look when presented in a
>> "creative" font.
>> ...
>
> +1
>
> And hey, it even works in email ;-)
My point exactly. It works in the media that we use for various kinds of
discussion: email, jabber rooms, presentations at meetings, etc. But it
doesn't work in our publication medium. And that's a shame.
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
More information about the rfc-interest
mailing list