[rfc-i] Pagination requirements

Andrew Sullivan ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Tue May 15 13:04:51 PDT 2012


On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:33:00PM -0700, SM wrote:
> I don't recall this point being mentioned before.  If that
> convention [1] is broken, is there a workaround?

Yes, as I said in the rest of my note.  People who care inevitably
make up a consistent one.  If you're nice -- and that's what I was
suggesting we be -- an early publisher of the item in question
establishes a canonical way to do it.

Style guides have already managed to accommodate themselves to things
like URIs ('visited on' and so forth).  This is just one more special
convention.  

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list