[rfc-i] RFC Format - final requirements and next steps
dhc at dcrocker.net
Fri May 11 11:30:49 PDT 2012
On 5/11/2012 9:50 AM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
> hanks to the feedback from the community, I've modified the
> requirements for the format of RFCs (which ties in I-D format
> as well, though any actual change to I-D format is outside my
> purview). I've collapsed two categories in to one (Edit and
> Review) since they have almost exactly the same requirements.
> RFC Editor requirements in most cases are similar to Edit/Review,
> but with a few unique ones important to the editors. Archive
> and End consumption still vary.
I suggest adding another category. You currently distinguish 'need' and
'want'. I believe a number of items on the lists are already satisfied.
These should be labeled 'exists' so that folks can see what is
/different/ in the lists from what we already have.
Need to be able to update documents easily and see how they might
look when published
is already satisfied.
I am assuming that a meta-need is to retain what we already have.
More information about the rfc-interest