[rfc-i] IETF RFC format <-> W3C pubrules
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Wed May 9 09:11:06 PDT 2012
On 2012-05-09 18:03, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> On 5/9/12 6:57 AM, "Phillip Hallam-Baker"<hallam at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ...which means: little metadata or no metadata to rely on, right?
>> I am not sure quite what you mean there.
> A really good example I've heard is "I want to pull out all of the ABNF and
> run it through a separate tool to ensure it is correct". Imagine similar
> markup for ASN.1 descriptions, etc.
> Metadata doesn't mean just author and publish date.
Another one is: "I want to mechanically check that all IETF and W3C
references are up-to-date".
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest